


In the October 2009 @dviser, we discussed the impact on superannuation of the new modern industrial awards that were due to commence on 1 January 2010. Since then, these awards have commenced with some further developments, particularly in relation to state employers. In this article, we talk about these new developments and provide some assistance for advisers dealing with employers in the new industrial world.
1. Summary of Fair Work and the modern awards
As a part of the Rudd Government’s reform process for industrial relations, the Fair Work Act, the Australian Industrial Relations Commission (now called Fair Work Australia or FWA) was given the job of consolidating upwards of 1500 old awards and agreements into 122 broad-based “modern awards” to commence 1 January 2010. The new modern awards are minimum rates awards, meaning employers just need to meet the minimum set out in the award. FWA drafted model clauses for the new modern awards, including new superannuation clauses.
2. Coverage of the modern awards
The Fair Work Act and the modern awards have been issued under the corporations power of the Commonwealth Constitution. This means the legislation automatically covers all employers who are corporations. Also, all states except WA have handed their industrial powers to the Commonwealth, so it will also cover most unincorporated employers (such as sole traders and partnerships) as well.
The following employees are covered by the new modern awards
The following employees are not covered by the new modern awards
3. Superannuation clauses in the modern awards
The superannuation clauses follow the model modern award drafted by the FWA.
“If an employee does not choose a superannuation fund, any superannuation fund nominated in the award covering the employee applies……. the employer must make the superannuation contributions provided for in clause X and pay the amount authorised … to one of the following superannuation funds or its successor:
(a) (named industry fund); …..
(i) any superannuation fund to which the employer was making superannuation contributions for the benefit of its employees before 12 September 2008, provided the superannuation fund is an eligible choice fund.”
FWA has advised that if a particular super fund has been named in an old award, the applicable modern award can be varied to include that super fund as a default fund.
As set out above, the “model” super clause was amended to provide that a default super fund included a successor fund to a super fund named in the award (including a pre 12 September 2008 fund). However, as this was a later variation to the “model” clause, some modern awards have yet to be varied to include this provision.
4. Issues arising from the modern awards
5. Default super fund grandfathering issues
6. New corporate/employer superannuation plans and choice
Since the introduction of the modern awards and the limitations on default funds under these awards, the role of an employee’s “choice” in fund selection has become paramount. Under the new industrial relations system, the vast majority of ordinary employees will be covered by the modern awards and the awards will name the default super fund. Consequently, if an employer wants to set up a new corporate/employer super plan for employees, the options are limited:
Legislation tabled providing tax relief for superannuation successor fund transfers
The Tax Laws Amendment Bill (No 6) 2009 has been tabled granting tax relief to superannuation funds merging or transferring under successor fund provisions. Merging funds can agree to transfer capital losses from the transferor fund to the transferee fund of a global or individual asset basis. Some revenue losses can be transferred as well. The new legislation is much broader that the original draft. The original draft appeared to be targeted only at merging industry fund transfers and not master super funds transferring or merging. The Bill was tabled in Parliament late November 2009 and is due to be debated in February 2010.
Relief for transfer of s.290-170 notices
A welcome inclusion in the new Bill is a provision that allows merging/transferring super funds some relief on receiving s.290-170 notices prior to the transfer. Currently, a member must put in an s.290-170 notice before the successor fund transfer if he/she wants to claim a tax deduction for personal contributions made to the releasing fund. Under the Bill, the receiving (successor) fund can accept an s.290-170 notice and/or variation after the transfer takes place, as long as the merging funds have elected to transfer losses from one fund to the other.
Adviser Note: The IOOF Group is undergoing a process of integrating a number of master superannuation funds through a series of successor fund transfers. As the above Bill has not been passed, we have/will be seeking s.290-170 notices with transferring members under the current law. However, for the handful of members who don't know the exact amount they need to claim as a deduction, we will accept a variation notice sent in after the transfer to adjust down any deductible amount, even if the legislation does not pass. In the unlikely event the legislation does not pass, we will seek a "no action" stance from the Australia Taxation Office in respect of these few variations.
Viewpoint
Contents
Newsflash: IOOF appoints Russell Investments
Technical Strategy: Changing pension providers get’s even more tricky post 1 January 2010 for income tested age pension…
Technical Strategy: Industrial Revolution Part 2: Modern awards commence…Now what for superannuation?
Technical Strategy: Commonwealth Seniors Health Card – Benefits whilst still working
Knowledge Centre: IOOF Pursuit Select – Practice planning around remunerations of services
Product Spotlight: Replacement of IOOF Portfolio Service disclosure documents effective 1 March 2010
Our People
Performance Data